Angry not apathetic: what anarchists do instead of voting

Angry not apathetic: what anarchists do instead of voting - Anarchist Federation

As the 2015 general election approaches, the Anarchist Federation explains the anarchist alternative to voting for social change.

The general election is here, and once again the parties are all over us like a rash, promising that they will fix things. But you don’t have to be an anarchist to know that nothing changes, whoever gets in. This is why politicians are keen on new methods such as postal voting. Labour, Tory, Liberal Democrat, nationalist (Plaid Cymru, SNP, Sinn Fein), ‘principled’ or ‘radical’ (Green Party, or leftists in some alliance), or nationalist-racist (UKIP etc), the fundamentals of the system are the same.

Whether we have the present electoral system or proportional representation, or however many people vote or don’t vote in an election or referendum, as we have just seen in Scotland, capitalism is at the driving wheel globally. As working class people, we are exploited whether we can take part in ‘free’ elections or live under an authoritarian regime. Capitalists and property owners continue to control the wealth that we create, and they protect it through the police, legal system, and military.

You can’t complain

Non-voters are told that, “If you don’t vote you can’t complain”. But voting under these circumstances is just pretending that the system we have is basically alright. It lets the winning party off the hook. The fact is, we have next to no say in the decisions that get taken by the people we elect. This is called ‘representative democracy’. Anarchists organise by ‘direct democracy’, where we can have a say in every decision, if we want to. We don’t put our power in someone else’s hands, so no one can betray us and abuse it. This really could work globally! Ask us how…

Campaigning against voting

A “don’t vote” campaign on its own is just as much a waste of time. The same goes for a protest vote for a leftist or novelty candidate. The time and money spent campaigning could be better used fixing some of the problems we face in our lives. Protesting, whether it is spoiling a ballot paper or marching in the street, fails to offer any real challenge. So, anarchists say, vote, or don’t vote. It won’t make any difference. What is more important, is to realise that elections prop up a corrupt system and divert us from winning real change.

Don’t vote, organise!

We should organise with our neighbours, workmates, other people we have shared interests with, and others who don’t have the privileges that some people have. We are the experts on what we need, and on the best way to run things for the common good. We need to use direct action to achieve this. Direct action is where we solve a problem without someone else representing us. By this we mean, not just protesting and asking for change, but things like occupying, sabotaging, working to rule, refusing to pay their prices or their rent, and striking (but not waiting for union leaders to tell us when we can and can’t!).

For example, when workers aren’t paid the wages owed them, rather than asking the government to give us better legal protection, we take action to force employers to pay. The Department for Work & Pensions has even named the Anarchist Federation and the Solidarity Federation among groups that are a serious threat to workfare, because we have shut down programmes. This was achieved with only a few hundred people. Imagine what could be done with thousands!

Taking it back

In reality, people are understandably afraid of taking the state on. But direct action doesn’t have to mean an all-out fight to defeat capitalism in one go. Anarchists do think that ultimately, there has to be a full revolution. But by confronting the system directly at any point we can start to take control. In fact, all the good things we think of as having been created by the state – free health care, free education, health & safety laws to protect us at work, housing regulations, sick pay, unemployment benefits, pensions – came about historically to put an end to organised campaigns of collective direct action that threatened their power. And where we would fail as individuals, together we can win.


4 responses to “Angry not apathetic: what anarchists do instead of voting

  1. If the parties of the Anti-Austerity UK alliance had not been included in the Leaders Debates, then there would not be such a vibrant re-awakening of the Left in the UK. The Scottish Referendum, as Leanne Wood has said, was the beginning of a Democratic Revolution. This revolution is on its way.

    • You can include all the lefty parties you like into the parliamentary system. It does not fundamentally challenge that system, or capitalism seeing as all that would happen when they are in government (these left coalitions that is) would be them maintaining the oppressive, exploitative conditions in which we find ourselves. The role of the State is to defend the current power structures of society, this can be seen historically with the creation of the nation-state with the rise of capitalism and the recuperation of any lefty social movements, ones that thing that aim for parliamentarianism and aren’t autonomous from heirarchial organisation, into the State apparatus. Becoming yet another crutch to up hold capitalism.

      Also, there’s nothing particularly radical about a capitalist state holding a referendum andparliamentarian representitve democracy, with different parties, functioning. That’s the norm for liberal democracies, no were near a ‘Revolution’.

      • The Left has been under sustained attack in the entire history of its existence. We must, as Gramsci would suggest, use every available platform that is available to us in the dissemination of the message, activities and plans of the alternative. This is real politics, pragmatic, progressive, inter-national, working and communicating at an extremely important moment in the history of the UK. This struggle is more of a democratic revolution than any classic notion of socialist revolution, although a rebirth of a socialist discourse has occurred in the mainstream. We must remember Marx when he said that as long as their is colonialism (UK) within Europe, socialism would not yet be possible. Raymond Williams, a seminal Welsh socialist and member of Plaid Cymru, wrote about the necessity of the deconstruction of the British State, i.e. successful struggles of national liberation, as a prerequisite project to the hope of socialism in the British Isles. Cf also Whispers of a Forgotten Nation: The Writings of Dr D. Ceri Evans on this site.

      • Nah, that is ludicrous. Using methods we know to already be recuperated or that are just useless is an idiotic idea, and not what Gransci was talking about. Marx had a great understanding of capitalism but naff politics (heck, his analysis was that we all have to go through some form of capitalist hell before we can realise communism, something the people of the Russian soviets were hard done by). Calling independence for Scotland or Wales a national liberation struggle is an insult to all the places that were colonised by the European imperial powers. Beyond that all nation states are imperial powers by their very nature, and so stand in opposition to communism being realised.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s